Category Archives: Politics

The Other War on Drugs

Posted on by
Reply

Although marijuana provides a large stream of revenue for drug cartels in Mexico, legalizing marijuana will not put as large of a dent into their operation as many people think.

Firstly, there is no reason for the cartels to stop growing at least some “crops” after legalization. A large portion of their product will find itself in Mexico, Central America, or even Europe and Asia. The cartels can also mobilize to produce other drugs instead, most notably methamphetamine and cocaine.

Second, the organizations behind the drug cartels are typically often involved in many other forms of forms of raising revenue. For example, kidnappings for ransom are especially notorious in Brazil. Kidnapping a wealthy native or a foreigner can bring in a ton of money for little work.

Obviously, new venues will arise from legalization for meeting the demand for the drug which will severely cut the amount of money drug cartels can rake in. While the immensity of this blow will be notable, a residue of demand will remain even in an America with legalized pot. Under the scenario of marijuana being prescribed by physicians, anyone who cannot get that prescription will naturally turn to the very same drug dealers they are familiar with today. Were marijuana to be regulated like wine, those who are underage will, too, be in a very similar situation.

Another issue that arises is where the marijuana will be grown. In order for the drug cartels to feel a diminished demand, the growing of the plant must become legal as well. Obviously, if the drug cannot be grown on a massive scale to meet the demand of those who continue to smoke pot after legalization, or if supply does not meet that demand, the black market will step in to fill that gap.

The drug cartels, the small rural families who actually grown the crops, and the middlemen in between are currently better equipped than all others in producing marijuana. They also have the most to gain from its sale. It is likely that, even with legalization, drug cartels will continue to survive.

 

Leibniz and I.

Posted on by
Reply

I have a curious idea that humanity has a way of positioning itself to become more like god. Most peculiar to me is the role of technology and the way in which it is used by man. Unlike “Richard Feynman”, I am not concerned about particles and other elements of the physical universe. Nor do I concern myself with the frivolousness of the veil of Maya which allows us to experience the world as though it were in constant flux.

Leibniz, on the other hand, was very much concerned with particles. In his thesis entitled The Monadology, the philosopher described how he believed the world to be: a static and finite set of matter. How does Leibniz account for differences between the world as he defines it and for the appearance of change within it? Leibniz describes the monads as a quasi-particles that maintain a connection to a higher power. These monads strive to be like god which causes them to shift in observable appearance. To Leibniz, the world is a definable set of matter with no change in the orientation of the matter that composes the objects we see. However, it appears to be the very opposite (of having change and an infinite possibility).

This is similar to those toys that have many rows of small metal rods in a rectangular shape that you can use to create impressions of physical objects. You press you hand against the metal rods, pushing an impression of your hand into the device. Much in the same way, Leibniz’s universe is like the toy which takes upon itself the impression of god. The monads strive to take a form similar to god, which causes our static world to contain room for some sort of change. (The particles do not move around but, rather, change in this unique characteristic.)

I am, admittedly , a creationist – I believe that man create god. By creating an idea of something so far above and beyond the realm of possibility and devoting oneself to this impossible fiction, we give our own creation immense power. We surrender our will and the responsibility of our actions to a being we might as well have crudely drawn on a sheet of paper. (A fictional character in the ether of the universe is after-all  just as real and all-knowing as one I drew with squiggly lines.)

Because we are afraid of being ourselves and of having to take responsibility for our actions, we create something that cannot be wrong. Mankind created god in order to have someone to blame for both the great and the dammed; because an infallible being will lead the way for all people to behave a certain way without the need to justify itself; and because human beings are aware of their puniness and minuteness but are too scared to admit it. Man is a sad, scared, stupid, unreasonable, and needing for something to make him feel better about himself and that is where a god steps in.

By examining the many cultures of the past and present, we can clearly notice that the religious and mythological beliefs represented the morals and values of the respective peoples. Tales of god-like beings spread across continents and survived centuries for functional reasons. Religion was used as a way to influence the behavior of other people according to what the culture required. For instance, the worship of a river was a direct acknowledgment of the dependence on the water the river brings. It was, and remains to be, a form of control despite the lack of necessity for such a belief system in today’s time.

This form of control is a method used by cowards who are too feeble or too misguided to defend their reasoning with pure reason alone. They turn to the majestic as a means to skip over the need for an argument entirely. Why engage in debate about whether abortion is right or wrong if you can simply cite a holy book that you claim is without fault. Voodoo, astrology, and healing crystals have as much say in reality as “god” does.

Cowardice is the fuel that keeps religion burning. Fear of the unknown, of the absurd, of death, of the other all cause anxiety for man. With god as the explanation  for all things, there is no accountability and, in turn, no longer a fear of doing what could be considered wrong.  We naturally create moral guidelines for others in everyday life when we make our own decisions but religion today has gone out of control. The tall walls that maintained society in years past have turned into jail cells that keep people from exploring new ideas and developing the ideals to accompany the developing world.

Entering a new era requires a new system of ethics, a new set of answers to the questions people will encounter throughout their lives. Religion has only answers for generations that are long lost and serves no purpose for us today.

New York (Finally) Recognizes Gay Marriage, Jesus Freaks Freak-Out

Posted on by
1

While I was away in upstate New York, news hit that the NY State Senate passed a bill to recognize same-sex marriages. For those who live in the metropolitan area around (and, of course, in) Manhattan, this legislative achievement was welcomed and celebrated. Gay pride was practically coming out of people’s noses as they walked down the street in jubilation of their newly granted right to wed.

Being away from the densely populated boroughs at the times gave some perspective on the matter – New York state is comprised of many right-leaning Jesus freaks. As Politico points out, the glee with which this bill was accepted in New York City is not present in more rural towns across the state. Even those who’s job it is to accept same-sex marriage will cling to their bible and seemingly nonsensical sense of repulsion to the act of same-sex relations.

A woman who works as a town clerk refuses to sign marriage licenses for same-sex couples because of her religious beliefs and, what she apparently believes is, her freedom to discriminate based on sexual orientation. If a police officer chooses to not help a person based on their race or if a school does not allow a student to enter because of his or her gender it would be very clear it would be because of ignorance and bigotry and such action would be met with fervent rebuke.

However, religion is like a drug that retards the user from being able to act with logic and reason. This woman and many like her see themselves as being above the law that they were hired to uphold. While discrimination of race and gender of course still exists but those who commit these acts are rarely as self-inflated as proclaiming that they are just in their decision to do so.

Obviously, the majority of New York state is at least tolerant of homosexuality if not entirely in support of equal rights. (Does anyone else feel that the discussion of whether some people should be granted the same rights as every one else based of some arbitrary characteristic is depressing?) And, I am not suggesting that those who do not live near New York City are bigots. What I am suggesting is that religion allows communities to feel justified in openly expressing revulsion towards homosexuality.

I suggest that those who feel that they cannot do their job as a result of a conflict with the legal rights of others and their own religious views should quit. The state does not make room for religious intolerance. If you want to exercise power to exclude others then perhaps a move to a different state is in order.